Reduction in homelessness: Let us pause to praise good news

By Richard Land - Aug 1, 2008 - 1

house drawing - iStock

The federal government has announced that the country has cut the number of “chronically homeless people” by approximately 30 percent between 2005 and 2007. The actual numbers are a reduction from 175,914 to 123,833—52,081 real people actually moved from the “homeless” to the “housed.”

Officials attribute the significant decline in chronically homeless people to a shift in federal policy embraced both by Congress and the Bush administration to focus local, state and federal resources on the “chronic homeless”—those suffering from mental illness, drug addiction, and physical disabilities.

This column originally posted at Casting Stones, a blog hosted by Beliefnet.com.

The new strategy, known as “Housing First,” has succeeded in making the most significant reduction in homelessness in more than a decade. Martha Burt, of New York’s Urban Institute, called the decline in chronic homelessness “nothing short of phenomenal.”

That is good news, and we should applaud all of those responsible for the tremendous success of these new programs at all levels of government.

However, the bad news is that homelessness is still far too prevalent in our society. In a country as affluent as America, we should not rest until we have virtually eliminated homelessness among our citizens.

We should draw encouragement from the success of the Housing First program to continue looking for government programs that do work and use them to address the remaining homeless in our population.

For perhaps the only time in my memory, I’m going to quote affirmatively Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), the chair of the U.S. House Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity, who said that while this reduction in homelessness is “great news,” that as a nation “we cannot rest because there is much that remains to be done.”

While she is right, let us at least take a moment to praise good news.

This column originally posted at Casting Stones, a blog hosted by Beliefnet.com.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Citizenship, Hunger/Homelessness

1 comments (post your own) feed

1 On Sep 23rd, 2008, at 3:17pm, John A. Land Jr. wrote:

I find that to be encouraging news but, like the lady said. “There is still work to be done”.  The thing that bothers me the most is when I encounter homless Veterans who put their lives on the line for this country.  Why can’t the government do more to help them?  It is they who are responsible for the freedoms that we enjoy (and take for granted) in the country every day.

John A. Land Jr.
Houston TX

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com