Parents’, Educators’ Rights and Responsibilities

By John Loudat - Aug 26, 2008 - comment

This past May, one of our own, former Lt. Gov. Walter Bradley, was quoted widely by media across the state expressing his concern about the publication of photographs of and interviews with two same-sex student couples in the Clovis High School yearbook. While many applauded the yearbook staff and the students for what they considered to be a courageous and groundbreaking move, many others, including many New Mexico Baptists, courageously insisted that there was good reason that such photographs had not been published in past yearbooks, nor should they have been in the current or any future yearbooks.

Bradley, who is a member of Central Baptist Church in Clovis and a member of the Baptist Convention of New Mexico’s Christian Life Committee, has had plenty of experience through the years of having microphones stuck in his face, so his words were the ones most people across the state saw and heard. In a letter to the editor that was published in the June 6 Albuquerque Journal, though, he sought to set the record straight about what he said and did not say about the issue. Bradley pointed out:

  • “… I raised the issue of protecting our children from public exposure of current thoughts that may harm their future.”
  • “I never mentioned the orientation of the students …”
  • He had told reporters that he thought “… all the pictures on those pages violated the school code regarding public display of affection.”
  • A yearbook that is supposed to highlight children’s academic year is not the appropriate venue for such photographs and comments.
  • The most important point he made was, “These students are minors and by law are protected,” and allowing such images and comments to be published amounted to “negligent exploitation” of the children.

Indeed, our society does not grant children full constitutional rights and responsibilities until they reach the age of 18. Until then, “we, the adults, parents and school officials are responsible,” Bradley correctly noted. There is good reason that children are almost never treated as adults when they break the law, nor can they be sued.

The responsibility is given to adult teachers, in Bradley’s words, “to assure no school policies or codes are violated and no laws are broken.” He commented that it was a good thing that the teacher who had been entrusted with that responsibility in relation to the yearbook no longer held that position, because she had not made the minor children aware of the policies and had allowed them to violate them.

Furthermore, some of the children’s parents knew nothing about the questionable material until it had been printed. “One student and mother who did not know objected and asked several people in the school to not publish the picture. They were denied,” Bradley said. “This mother and student were obviously distraught over, as she said ‘the labeling’ of her child. One parent said legal remedies are being explored.”

Since her child is her responsibility, there’s not a thing in the world wrong with that.

The superintendent of Clovis schools said in a meeting with pastors that “school policies will be reviewed, and, if necessary, rewritten to ensure it doesn’t happen again,” Bradley added.

Since that is the responsibility of school officials, that, too, is a good thing.

The issue is the right and responsibility of both parents and school officials to protect minor children from being used and exploited by groups or individuals who want to make a point. Parents have had, and should continue to have, that important right, and teachers and administrators have had, and should continue to have, that important responsibility.

A hearty “Well done” to all those who took that courageous stand and made that important point. Many of the families of New Mexico thank you!

This article is reprinted from the August 2, 2008, issue of the Baptist New Mexican, the newsjournal of Baptist Convention of New Mexico.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Children, Education, Sexual Purity, Homosexuality

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com